Data Collection For Analysis And DesignWhat techniques are available to the design team for
collecting data? The objective is to
develop an understanding of key decisions, communications and coordination
requirements, and how they are supported with information. The team needs to
examine decisions, the flow of information in the organization, communication
patterns, and they types of process undertaken. Observation: One technique for collecting data on a process
is to observe that process. Frequently
in systems analysis and design we will “walk through” a system, observing
crucial information flows and decision points.
Then we may use one of the graphical techniques described later in this
chapter to document our understanding of how the system functions. Observations can also be quite structured. We may develop a rating form of some type to
collect data on the frequency or inquiries, say, in a credit office. The analyst prepares a form showing the
possible inquiries and then, during a sample of different days and hours, codes
the actual inquiries. Interview: The system analyst spends a great deal of time
interacting with other, particularly in interview settings. Interviews have varying degrees of
structure. For a first meeting, there
may be no structure at all; the analyst may be getting acquainted with the user
and gaining a broad understanding of the problem areas. Often, as the project progresses, more
structured interview are conducted. The analyst may wish to prepare in advance
an interview schedule containing the questions to be asked and the points to be
covered. The main this is to be prepared. Questionnaires: A questionnaire allows us to obtain data
from a relatively large number of people at a reasonable cost. A questionnaire
can be thought of as structured interview form with questions designed so they
can be answered without face-to-face encounter.
The design of a good questionnaire is a difficult task. Although the idea is an extension of a structured
interview form, the questionnaire is, in principle, capable of being completed by the respondent
alone without an interviewer present. Comparing the Alternatives: Both questionnaires and
interviews are important for the analyst, though interviewing will probably be
used more often. An interview makes it easy to follow a new tangent. The
respondent is not constrained by the limitations of the questions but can
expand in other directions. If the
question is ambiguous, the interviewer explains what is desired. Interviews are the best technique in an
unstructured setting and when it is necessary to probe issues in depth. Questionnaires offer the advantage of being relatively inexpensive to administer to a large group of respondent. They are well suited to expanding data collection beyond the interview. For example, assume a system is developed to be used by a number of sales representatives nationwide. If the firm has five hundred sales representatives, it is impossible to include all of them on a design team.
|